|
Post by darkme on May 2, 2007 9:09:12 GMT -6
lol... ohk makes sense!
I agree accidents happen
|
|
|
Post by Zach on May 2, 2007 20:59:44 GMT -6
yeah
|
|
|
Post by Justin R. Wilkerson on May 3, 2007 14:32:30 GMT -6
yea, it was kinda stupid, but accidents do happen!
|
|
|
Post by Zach on May 3, 2007 18:12:08 GMT -6
yeah your right! Karma
|
|
|
Post by Zach on May 5, 2007 13:10:06 GMT -6
So, lets talk about the upcoming (or not?) Elections of 2008. Any speculations? Who do you think will win? Who's got your vote?
|
|
|
Post by alyssamilanofan on May 8, 2007 9:25:55 GMT -6
What do you all think about Hilary Clinton from what I've seen she got quite the campaign she has a lot of things planned I would love to see come true for the US so what do you all think?
|
|
|
Post by Zach on May 8, 2007 15:56:03 GMT -6
Hmm.. well she's ok. Not the most-liked here in the USA, but she will probally win. I'm for Barack Obama, but John Edwards sounds okay too.
|
|
|
Post by Justin R. Wilkerson on May 15, 2007 16:30:07 GMT -6
Hillary Clinton is a person that would morally bankrupt this country, but as far as i am concerned i would like to see Rudy Gulliani win! RUDY IN '08!
|
|
|
Post by Justin R. Wilkerson on May 15, 2007 16:34:25 GMT -6
and karma for zach for saying he doesnt like Hillary YAY ZACH (I always knew he was a kool guy! LOL j/k)
|
|
|
Post by darkme on May 16, 2007 13:30:59 GMT -6
come on now Justin! people are free to like whomever they want! and not like hilary clinton doesn't make a person cool! sorry if I may sound rude... plz don't take it this way ;D
|
|
|
Post by Zach on May 17, 2007 7:58:56 GMT -6
Hehehe, well thanks Justin for the karma.
Thanks to Noor. Karma for you
|
|
|
Post by chelsi4psaw on Jun 24, 2007 14:11:58 GMT -6
You know I am so sickened by people who either: 1) call protesters "cowards" because they won't go and fight the war, when they themselves won't serve and 2) people try and completely avoid the subject of the war by saying all politicians are screwed up and yet they support the war. I don't think its ever occured to them that what they're saying is so contradictory. The support the war, but they think the politicians (that started the war) are a bunch of crooks.
and these 2 kinds of people are the type fo people who voted for bush...most 9not all) are ignorant, naive people that have never tried to think things through and just follow slogans lyk "i'd rather fight them over there than over here"... they're bushies i don't "hate" Bush i just think he's too dmb to handle an entire country.... so he needs the help of cheney... who is too dumb to even handle a gun.. tisk tisk
|
|
|
Post by alyssamilanofan on Jun 24, 2007 15:44:03 GMT -6
You know I am so sickened by people who either: 1) call protesters "cowards" because they won't go and fight the war, when they themselves won't serve and 2) people try and completely avoid the subject of the war by saying all politicians are screwed up and yet they support the war. I don't think its ever occured to them that what they're saying is so contradictory. The support the war, but they think the politicians (that started the war) are a bunch of crooks. and these 2 kinds of people are the type fo people who voted for bush...most 9not all) are ignorant, naive people that have never tried to think things through and just follow slogans lyk "i'd rather fight them over there than over here"... they're bushies i don't "hate" Bush i just think he's too dmb to handle an entire country.... so he needs the help of cheney... who is too dumb to even handle a gun.. tisk tisk I can say what you mean Bush doesn't seem very smart and I'm certainly not supporter of him or the war I think it has an opposite effect on the world and that it's dividing countries.. the US spends a lot of money on that war, that could've been spend on useful things that would actually help people not kill them (I think it's justified that Saddam's regime was taken down but it's definitely not the reason why he went there at least in my opinion it's not the reason)
|
|
|
Post by waed89 on Jul 22, 2007 7:52:07 GMT -6
well honestly, i find your comments at the very end very offensive to me, but hey that is your Right, if was smart h wouldn't have been elected president of the US He was smart enough to be elected but his bright intellect wasn't exactly revealed to the world looking at the way he is handling things in Iraq & Afghanistan !
|
|
|
Post by chang90216 on Aug 7, 2007 11:16:39 GMT -6
I am so sorry but could you guys give me some information about current US political affairs?
|
|
|
Post by Zach on Aug 7, 2007 11:58:11 GMT -6
I am so sorry but could you guys give me some information about current US political affairs? No problem. But, what would you like to know?
|
|
|
Post by llVoXll on Sept 15, 2007 23:12:02 GMT -6
You know I am so sickened by people who either: 1) call protesters "cowards" because they won't go and fight the war, when they themselves won't serve and 2) people try and completely avoid the subject of the war by saying all politicians are screwed up and yet they support the war. looool me too xD i hate ppl that only complain without achieving or even trying to achieve a solution, just say 'he is wrong, this is wrong, everything is wrong' so if u ask them what should we do then, they'd either say 'u'r wrong too', 'SOMETHING!' or 'vote for me next year'
|
|
|
Post by ViCtoria* on Sept 17, 2007 10:34:40 GMT -6
Hey hey I have a question! Do you think the next US president should be a Democrat or a Republican? If they end war, I think the next president should be Republican. Take Churchill as an example. During and the next few years after war, he was a great president. But during peaceful times, he did not know how to keep society going and economical benefits increasing. So after the fictitious Republican president that ends the war (on Iraq), a Democrat one should come during our peaceful epoch Woohoo. Now take Carter as another example. President Carter led the United States during a conflictive moment, and he has earned criticisms because he did not know how to control the people during this moment, but I guess he would have led the country better if no war had been happening at the present. Hope you understood my point, I'm lost! Lol.
|
|
|
Post by Zach on Sept 17, 2007 18:33:37 GMT -6
Hehe. Well I think, being a liberal, that a Democrat should take office because most Republicans agree with the war. Most of the Democrats disagree with it. I think several of the people running now should be in the cabinet (like.. the secretary/minister of war), and not running for president. What do you think??
|
|
|
Post by harisstavr on Sept 23, 2007 8:41:01 GMT -6
I do not support what President Bush does. I mean, he could help fighting terrorism in another way than leading to a war!
|
|