fathiamar
New Member
Ambassador from Malaysia, Winner of YFCI Logo Contest
Posts: 201
|
Post by fathiamar on Dec 21, 2006 0:24:00 GMT -6
Is it Saddam's fault? I read about it, and it's because of a dirty hospital somewhere in Libya. www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,237341,00.html
|
|
winmsn
New Member
randomness. (:
Posts: 73
|
Post by winmsn on Dec 21, 2006 20:24:08 GMT -6
Correction : 4 Bulgarian Nurses, and 1 Palestinan Doctor have been setenced to death in Libya for deliberately infected 160 children with HIV. And don't trust Fox News.
|
|
fathiamar
New Member
Ambassador from Malaysia, Winner of YFCI Logo Contest
Posts: 201
|
Post by fathiamar on Dec 21, 2006 21:27:04 GMT -6
|
|
winmsn
New Member
randomness. (:
Posts: 73
|
Post by winmsn on Dec 22, 2006 14:51:43 GMT -6
Um, I heard it a few days ago on the BBC. Meh, maybe I used the wrong number
|
|
|
Post by darkme on Dec 25, 2006 2:58:11 GMT -6
and another thing: teachers and engineers salarys at one point reached 1,2,3 US dollars and I am not kidding! my mom used to get it and me and huda wud share it!
|
|
|
Post by alyssamilanofan on Dec 25, 2006 7:55:36 GMT -6
Correction : 4 Bulgarian Nurses, and 1 Palestinan Doctor have been setenced to death in Libya for deliberately infected 160 children with HIV. And don't trust Fox News. something is terribly wrong with that trial at first I thought that those nurses and doctors were monsters. But I don't think that they did it. The judge made a rule in 7 minutes, he refuses to let neutral researches, do an investigation and things like that. I don't think they did it.. I hope that in the new trial the truth will really come out..
|
|
|
Post by darkme on Dec 25, 2006 23:05:57 GMT -6
well, wat truth r u talking bout? plz do explain bcoz it doesn't rilly matter the time it takes the judge to have the ruling! its clear that Saddam is guilty and that he have rilly screwed up Iraq! do u believe that the USA wud be in Iraq now if it wasn't for him? well I don't! bcoz if he was a good leader then it wudn't have been like that! it wud be that Iraqi ppl r living in peace!!! but when it cums to Saddam being neutral is kinda impossible I must admit! u can't be neutral bcoz of all the things he did stop u from being neutral! wudnt u agree?
|
|
winmsn
New Member
randomness. (:
Posts: 73
|
Post by winmsn on Dec 26, 2006 10:08:45 GMT -6
well, wat truth r u talking bout? plz do explain bcoz it doesn't rilly matter the time it takes the judge to have the ruling! its clear that Saddam is guilty and that he have rilly screwed up Iraq! do u believe that the USA wud be in Iraq now if it wasn't for him? well I don't! bcoz if he was a good leader then it wudn't have been like that! it wud be that Iraqi ppl r living in peace!!! but when it cums to Saddam being neutral is kinda impossible I must admit! u can't be neutral bcoz of all the things he did stop u from being neutral! wudnt u agree? I think she is talking about the trial in libya. If you wish to talk about the Trial in Libya : please create a new thread to avoid confusion. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Zach on Dec 26, 2006 11:04:42 GMT -6
Yes, that would be better.
|
|
winmsn
New Member
randomness. (:
Posts: 73
|
Post by winmsn on Dec 26, 2006 11:23:06 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by darkme on Dec 29, 2006 13:40:04 GMT -6
so in less than four hours Saddam can be dead! Al Maleky had sent a letter to the religious leaders in Iraq asking them wheather Saddam shud be put to death now! if not in these upcuming 4 hours then they will wait after the eid holidays! what do u think bout this?
|
|
winmsn
New Member
randomness. (:
Posts: 73
|
Post by winmsn on Dec 30, 2006 10:29:49 GMT -6
Saddam is now offically dead.
|
|
|
Post by Zach on Dec 30, 2006 10:59:48 GMT -6
So now we all now he has been hanged. Do you think the fighting will get worse? Will it cease? Do you think the death penalty is right? Should Saddam have been hanged? Would it have been better for him to have life inprisonment? What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by nairobian on Dec 30, 2006 15:16:04 GMT -6
So now we all now he has been hanged. Do you think the fighting will get worse? Will it cease? Do you think the death penalty is right? Should Saddam have been hanged? Would it have been better for him to have life inprisonment? What do you think? I don't know.. I mean, i think the actual sentence was stupid, cuz honestly, how do you repent wen you're DEAD? Isn't that what we want him to do? Feel horrible about what he did? *sigh* But life imprisonment wouldn't be smart either.. he'd have 'connections' like the mafia or soemthing and everyone would be killed. what I don't like is the US' involvement in it.. Nothing happened to them. Why'd they interfere? (no offence to nobody) I think the ICJ shoulda judged..
|
|
|
Post by darkme on Dec 31, 2006 9:36:01 GMT -6
ok, what is "ICJ"?
|
|
|
Post by AK on Dec 31, 2006 12:04:22 GMT -6
"ICJ" refers to the International Court of Justice.It ian organ of the UN, just like the General Assembly and the Security Council.
|
|
|
Post by darkme on Dec 31, 2006 15:58:55 GMT -6
oh I got it! thanx Anu! u have done ur good deed in this new year! what a way to start it, I wud like to give u a karma since its my first post in this new year and well I kinda disagree, the trail had to be judged by the Iraqi government and not anything else, we don't need anything more to let his followers say it wasn't fair!!! and they already do bcuz they say it was controled by the USA but I like to believe that the trail was 99% Iraqi!!!!
|
|
|
Post by AK on Dec 31, 2006 22:19:53 GMT -6
oh I got it! thanx Anu! u have done ur good deed in this new year! what a way to start it, I wud like to give u a karma since its my first post in this new year Thank you very much Noor! Okay, the trial had to be conducted by the Iraqi Government, but the US shouldn't have interfered at all, in any way.As nairobian has said, that there was no reason for the US to interfere, so why did they have to be involved in this? I think it would be much better if the US stopped meddling in the affairs of other countries.
|
|
|
Post by SoHuda on Jan 1, 2007 2:38:04 GMT -6
Okay, the trial had to be conducted by the Iraqi Government, but the US shouldn't have interfered at all, in any way.As nairobian has said, that there was no reason for the US to interfere, so why did they have to be involved in this? I think it would be much better if the US stopped meddling in the affairs of other countries. ok so if the US didn't interfer then who wud get rid of Saddam? NO ONE! but I must say that they did just one good thing and it was 4 all the wrong reasons!!! and yes 'course it'll b much better if the US stopped meddling in everythin! it'll b a better world!!
|
|
winmsn
New Member
randomness. (:
Posts: 73
|
Post by winmsn on Jan 1, 2007 9:38:44 GMT -6
The way Saddam's death was carried out was inhumane.
1) Saddam used to hang people; hanging Saddam's just shows that Iraq hasn't learned anything
2) He was guility, but did not face a fair trial : the trial should have been conducted in an international court.
3) The people in the gallows were taunting him.
|
|